Dear Fake Headteacher,

Our school was a happy school.
The staff were brilliant.
The previous head was inspiring.
I loved teaching there.

The curriculum was at the heart of the school. The curriculum was fabulous and pupils, who had a lot of emotional and social challenges, loved the school.

However, the head didn’t agree with SATs so she didn’t invite children to attend after school booster groups or spend most of year 6 revising and preparing the pupils to pass a test. Call it naivety? Call it strong leadership?

After several years of low SATs scores, an academy eventually took over and everything changed.

Within 6 months, the head resigned.
Within 8 months, the deputy resigned.
Within 18 months, 10 members of staff resigned, either through ill health or found other jobs. Including me.

Then you were appointed (after 3 interim academy heads in the space of 3 months – they all mysteriously disappeared – the academy way?)

The problem was, you assumed the teaching and learning was terrible because of the low SATs scores. However, the issue was a philosophy. A philosophy that concentrated on the curriculum and not tests. A few tweaks here and there, to satisfy the need to produce good SATs scores would have been welcomed. But you didn’t. If only you had taken the time to find out.

Instead, you told us…

to scrap most of our foundation subject teaching

to ensure we had 4 ability groups for every lesson

not to deliver whole class inputs – target groups only

to write A4 plans the night before (with written annotations as proof of AfL)

to photocopy these plans and hand them in on a Friday

to hand in a timetable every week so you knew what we were teaching

to have 4 different learning objectives for every lesson

to use random named lolly sticks to ask pupils questions

that teaching assistants must not sit with one group for more than 10 minutes

that written praise was banned in books (focus more on next steps)

that all work must be signed by the teacher and the learning objective must be highlighted green or orange to show whether the pupil understood the work

that the use of green and pink highlighters must be used every day for marking

that pupils must use purple pens at least 3 times a week in response to teacher feedback

we must attend a morning meeting at 8:30am twice a week to ‘touch base’ with each other

we had to attend pupil progress meetings every 6 weeks

we must print off learning objectives slips that were often longer than what the pupils wrote in the lesson (description of the task, self evaluation, success criteria etc)

to write verbal feedback in books whenever we gave advice to a pupil and then to write down exactly we said – and what they said back!

that ofsted would crucify us if we didn’t do all of the things you told us to do because ‘that’s what they’re looking for’

our power points had to have the school logo on and use the agreed font style

that you would do unannounced learning walks every week and use a 15 point checklist we had to be seen to be doing every time

we would be put on an action plan if we didn’t fulfill the 15 point checklist

that had to prove any practical lesson we taught by taking photos – and stick them in books with annotations

to tell parents that their child was below standard for their age before the end of September and invite the child to attend after school booster groups every Wednesday and Friday (run by staff)

there would be book scrutinies every 6 weeks with written feedback on what was wrong (mostly!)

that lunchtime was being shortened from 1 hour to 45 minutes to give more time for learning

we had to write small ladder shapes and two stars and a wish in their books at least 3 times a week to make it clear to ofsted the teachers knew how to move the learning forward

we had to travel 2 hours to another school in the academy to observe other teachers

we had to improve the behaviour of the pupils (that had unsurprisingly worsened since your arrival) using a complicated A3 flowchart of what actions to follow and when to follow them. It was so complicated, no-one bothered.

we had to write reports on pupils who were misbehaving  Рto build up evidence for future exclusions (5 exclusions were made in your first 12 months)

we weren’t allowed to display pupils’ work because it didn’t help children learn

that we had to have working walls that had to be done the same way in every class

we had no time to discuss workload because ‘it is what it is’ at the moment and anyone should leave they can’t handle the pressure

we should ensure we were ‘happy’ with the data we handed in otherwise there would be extra ‘support’ given to staffmassage data if needed?

repeatedly in staff meetings, ‘it’s not a good picture’

Your stubborn and naive philosophy on how to improve the school meant

2017-19 Full blogs are now archived in the book ‘How Do You Think the Lesson Went?’